Demonstrators — some carrying “Black Lives Matter” signs and portraits of Wright — applauded and cheered outside the court. A brass band played.

Jury deliberated over four days

Jurors deliberated about 27 hours since Monday, when, in closing arguments, a prosecutor described Potter’s actions as a tragic blunder born of recklessness or negligence and the defense characterized the shooting as an honest mistake, not a crime.

The maximum penalty for first-degree manslaughter predicated on reckless use/ handling of a firearm is 15 years in prison. Since Potter, 49, has no criminal history, Minnesota sentencing guidelines recommend a sentence roughly between 6 and 8.5 years in prison.

Judge Regina Chu thanked the jury, which midway through deliberations appeared to struggle to reach a consensus.

“I’m so proud of you. You should be proud of yourselves. Without civic minded citizens like you our system of justice could not function. Thank you for your service. Thank you for your sacrifices.”

A female juror cried, according to the pool report. Another juror comforted her as she trembled and sobbed.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison told reporters that he was saddened “there will be an empty chair at the Wright family dinner during the holidays.”

“We have a degree of accountability for Daunte’s death. Accountability is not justice,” he said. “Justice is beyond the reach that we have in this life for Daunte but accountability is an important step, a critical, necessary step on the road to justice for us all.”

Law enforcement officers are held in “high regard” but will also be held to “high standards,” Ellison said.

Of Potter, he said: “She was remorseful. I mean what decent person wouldn’t be brokenhearted and sad if they were involved in something like this… I wish nothing but the best for her and her family.”

Chu denied a request by Potter’s defense lawyers to allow her to go home before sentencing, citing her deep roots in the community.

“I cannot treat this case any differently than any other case,” Chu said.

The former Brooklyn Center police officer was handcuffed and escorted out of the courtroom. Her husband, Jeff, a former law enforcement officer, was heard yelling, “I love you, Kim,” according to a pool report.

“I love you back,” she said.

She was transferred to Minnesota Correctional Facility — Shakopee, about 25 miles southwest of Minneapolis, according to the state Department of Corrections. Sentencing was set for February 18.

Potter yelled ‘Taser’ before shooting Wright

As video of the incident shows, Potter yelled “Taser” repeatedly before she shot Wright with her handgun. She then said, “Holy sh*t! I just shot him!” She added: “I grabbed the wrong f**king gun, and I shot him.” She resigned from the department days later.

The case centered on the jury’s interpretation of Potter’s fatal error — whether it was, as the prosecution argued, due to her recklessness and negligence, or whether it was an unfortunate accident that does not rise to the level of a crime, as the defense has argued.

More than 30 witnesses, including Potter herself, took the stand during the trial’s eight days of testimony. An emotional Potter testified for hours and broke down in tears several times as she described the “chaotic” moments that led up to the shooting.

“I was very distraught. I just shot somebody. I’m sorry it happened,” she said, crying, in court. “I’m so sorry.”

Under cross-examination, Potter said Wright had not threatened the officers before she fired. She said she did not remember much of what happened after the shooting but acknowledged she did not help treat Wright’s injuries or check on her fellow officers.

Potter was far from a rogue officer. She testified that before that day she had never deployed her Taser or fired a handgun while on duty, and she had never had a complaint against her.

The former officer described the moments before the shooting as “chaotic” and recalled the “look of fear” of another officer as he struggled with Wright.

“I didn’t want to hurt anybody,” she cried at one point.

Wright’s mom and dad testified

In her closing argument, Assistant Minnesota Attorney General Erin Eldridge said Potter made a series of bad choices during the traffic stop that led to the fatal mix-up.

“Accidents can still be crimes if they occur because of recklessness or culpable negligence,” the prosecutor said. “It’s not a defense to the crimes charged.”

Wright’s mother and father testified for the prosecution.

University of South Carolina School of Law associate professor Seth Stoughton testified for the state, calling Potter’s actions “excessive and inappropriate.”

“The use of deadly force was not appropriate, and the evidence suggests that a reasonable officer in Officer Potter’s position could not have believed it was proportional to the threat at the time,” Stoughton said.

The defense characterized the killing as an unfortunate accident that should not be considered a crime.

“Everybody makes mistakes, nobody’s perfect,” said attorney Earl Gray. “This lady made a mistake and a mistake is not a crime.”

He also argued Potter was within her rights to use deadly force to protect a fellow officer, who was reaching into the vehicle when Wright attempted to drive away.

“Even though she didn’t know she was using it, she had the right to, and that’s what the law is,” he said.

A Taser would have been effective in incapacitating Wright, the first defense witness testified. Still, deadly force was warranted if an officer is partly inside a vehicle as a suspect is attempting to drive away, said Stephen Ijames, a law enforcement expert and former assistant police chief from Missouri.

Potter’s former boss testified he concluded there was “no violation … of policy, procedure, law,” after reviewing body camera and other video following the shooting.

On Thursday, the verdict on the more serious first-degree manslaughter count was reached at 11:40 a.m local time, according to Chu. The verdict on the lesser charge was agreed to about an hour earlier. The conviction of a police officer is rare.